arXiv caps authors at two submissions a month to curb AI paper flood

Reported 4 Oct 2026 · entered the ledger 5 Oct 2026 · last checked 5 Oct 2026 · Side effect

Surging volumes of low-quality, AI-assisted paper submissions overwhelmed volunteer moderators and delayed legitimate papers on preprint repository arXiv, prompting the platform to impose a hard quota of two submissions per month per author.

The institution arXiv institution

The mechanism Friction removed externality scale 4 of 5, fast

Adaptation price a cost on the sender; the filter is money again

The case as the ledger holds it

The assumption that broke: Preprint submissions carry sufficient manual drafting friction that unpaid volunteer moderation can keep pace with incoming volume without artificial author quotas.
The first-order effect: arXiv received 40,363 submissions in September, up 309 percent over a decade and doubling in two years, driven by low-quality and thin AI-assisted papers that consumed disproportionate moderator review time and delayed legitimate papers by days or weeks.
Who pays: Volunteer preprint moderators facing unsustainable review loads and legitimate researchers whose papers face publishing delays · group: Volunteers and reviewers
Scale and speed: 4 of 5 · fast

Evidence 3 pages read

Unite.AI ↗ 4 Oct 2026
Last week, preprint server arXiv announced that it will be instituting a new rate-limiting policy for submitters, who will now be capped at two submissions per month... Boboris stated that arXiv received 40,363 submissions in September 2026 – almost double the 20,569 received in September 2024... The latest month’s submissions, Boboris observed, also generated almost 9,000 support tickets for arXiv staff and moderators.
Startup Fortune ↗ 2 Oct 2026
Starting October 1, arXiv capped every author to two submissions a month and three active submissions at any time, the clearest sign yet that AI-generated paper spam has overwhelmed the volunteer moderators who run the world's main preprint server.
The Register ↗ 2 Oct 2026
arXiv, the preprint paper repository, is seeing so many low-quality submissions, with AI tools helping drive the surge, that it has imposed a hard limit of two new submissions per month per submitter, regardless of whether they were produced solely by humans or with help from AI tools.

The second reader every claim, checked against the page

Claim	Verdict	Note
Starting October 1, arXiv capped every author to two submissions a month and three active submissions at any time	supported	Page 1: "Starting October 1, arXiv capped every author to two submissions a month and three active submissions at any time"
October 1	supported	Page 1: "Starting October 1, arXiv capped every author..." and "published October 1"
a rejected submission still counts against your monthly total	supported	Page 1: "a rejected submission still counts against your monthly total"
The rule applies across every category, not just computer science	supported	Page 1: "The rule applies across every category, not just computer science"
Because of the exponential increase in submissions, arXiv is limiting the number of papers that a person can submit each month to two.	supported	Page 1: Thomas Dietterich posted on X: "Because of the exponential increase in submissions, arXiv is limiting the number of papers that a person can submit each month to two."
any author caught submitting a paper with hallucinated references or leftover LLM instructions baked into the text faces a one-year ban	supported	Page 1: "any author caught submitting a paper with hallucinated references or leftover LLM instructions baked into the text faces a one-year ban"
arXiv has also started requiring that review and position papers in computer science already be accepted at a peer-reviewed venue before they can go up	supported	Page 1: "arXiv has also started requiring that review and position papers in computer science already be accepted at a peer-reviewed venue before they can go up"
arXiv now limits submitters to up to two submissions per calendar month, with a limit of three total active submissions at any given time	supported	Page 2: Kat Boboris wrote: "arXiv now limits submitters to up to two submissions per calendar month, with a limit of three total active submissions at any given time"
In September alone, arXiv said that it had received 40,363 submissions.	supported	Page 2: "In September alone, arXiv said that it had received 40,363 submissions."
The same month 10 years ago saw it receive just 9,869 submissions; two years ago that number was 20,569.	supported	Page 2: "The same month 10 years ago saw it receive just 9,869 submissions; two years ago that number was 20,569."
Submissions have increased 309 percent in the past decade, in other words - and doubled in the past two years alone.	supported	Page 2: "Submissions have increased 309 percent in the past decade, in other words - and doubled in the past two years alone."
A relatively small proportion of authors are submitting a large number of low-quality papers and consuming a disproportionate fraction of the moderators’ time	supported	Page 2: Thomas Dietterich said: "A relatively small proportion of authors are submitting a large number of low-quality papers and consuming a disproportionate fraction of the moderators’ time"
This is unfair to authors who continue to submit quality papers — their papers can be delayed for days or weeks as a result.	supported	Page 2: Dietterich said: "This is unfair to authors who continue to submit quality papers — their papers can be delayed for days or weeks as a result."
arXiv announced a new rate-limiting policy capping submitters at two submissions per month.	supported	Page 3: "preprint server arXiv announced that it will be instituting a new rate-limiting policy for submitters, who will now be capped at two submissions per month."
arXiv received 40,363 submissions in September 2026, compared to 20,569 in September 2024 and 9,869 in September 2016.	supported	Page 3: "arXiv received 40,363 submissions in September 2026 – almost double the 20,569 received in September 2024, and more than four times the 9,869 received in September 2016."
September 2026 submissions generated almost 9,000 support tickets for arXiv staff and moderators.	supported	Page 3: "The latest month’s submissions, Boboris observed, also generated almost 9,000 support tickets for arXiv staff and moderators"
Monthly submissions to arXiv's cs.AI category from January 2024 to September 2026 showed a more than sixfold increase.	supported	Page 3 image caption: "Monthly submissions to arXiv’s cs.AI category from January 2024 to September 2026, showing a more than sixfold increase over the period."
'Our moderators are observing an increase in thin papers of narrow scope, as well as ‘salami’ papers, where a single work is broken up and submitted as a set of smaller papers.'	supported	Page 3: "‘Our moderators are observing an increase in thin papers of narrow scope, as well as ‘salami’ papers, where a single work is broken up and submitted as a set of smaller papers.’"
'There is also a marked increase in dense, AI-written papers. AI tools are making it easy for authors to flood arXiv and other repositories with these low-value papers.'	supported	Page 3: "‘There is also a marked increase in dense, AI-written papers. AI tools are making it easy for authors to flood arXiv and other repositories with these low-value papers.’"
In May 2026, arXiv implemented a one-year ban for unchecked AI content.	supported	Page 3: "in May of this year, arXiv had taken the measure of implementing a one-year ban for unchecked AI content" (article published October 4, 2026)
In October 2025, arXiv required submitters of survey and position papers to have peer-backing.	supported	Page 3: "in October of last year, had told submitters of survey papers and position papers ... that they would need peer-backing" (article published October 4, 2026)